Obama “Changes”
November 24, 2008 at 7:48 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentAs Obama’s inauguration day becomes closer, it is crucial he attempt to further unite the country. While he clearly won with a majority, all good leaders should try to gain the supporters of even those strongly against them. Intense Republicans and many of the southern states fear what will result if Obama follows through with everything he preached during his campaign—especially high taxes for those making above 250,000.
Obama seems to be reaching out to this group of people, however, and seems to be on his way to winning them over. Although he constantly campaigned upon high taxes for the upper tax bracket, he now says he will continue to let Bush’s tax cut plan remain in place until it expires in 2010—previously he said he was going to repeal it. Obama now focuses on a stimulus package that he describes in a New York Times Article as “a two-year, nationwide effort to jumpstart job creation in America and lay the foundation for a strong and growing economy. We’ll put people back to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools that are failing our children, and building wind farms and solar panels, fuel-efficient cars and the alternative energy technologies that can free us from our dependence on foreign oil and keep our economy competitive in the years ahead.” If this choice to delay the tax increases, raises his support among the Republicans perhaps his stimulus package proposal will have a better likelihood of being passed. Obama knows “passing this plan won’t be easy…I will need and seek support from Republicans and Democrats, and I’ll be welcome to ideas and suggestions from both sides of the aisle.
This recent decision by Obama may have won over many new supporters, but how will this affect those who supported him from the beginning? Obama campaigned on the idea of “change,” and part of this change involved higher tax rates for the upper bracket of people. Although he still plans to enact a stimulus package, by doing so he is delaying his promises to the people who voted for him. It makes me wonder how Obama will be once inaugurated. If he is already changing up a critical piece to his campaign platform, it’s highly questionable what else he might change his mind about. This decision may have been beneficial as far as Republicans are concerned, but he may have placed seeds of doubt in the minds of his supporters. Obama’s decisions throughout the remaining weeks until his inauguration will largely affect the level of support that he has entering office.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/24/us/politics/24transition.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp
Yet Another Bailout?
November 18, 2008 at 11:02 am | In Group 6, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentIt appears that without government aid General Motors will go bankrupt, and without further intervention the rest of Detroit’s big three, Chrysler and Ford, could follow suit. The ripple effect from these bankruptcies would be massive, it is predicated that up to 1.2 million jobs could be lost. It could also plunge the U.S. into an even deeper recession. Obviously there needs to be some sort of intervention; but what is the proper course to take?
Both sides to the argument have very valid points. On the one hand why should the United States government bail out companies that have refused to adopt, innovate, and keep up with industry standards? Doesn’t this sort of action promote the attitude that American’s need to shake? On the other side though are the potential consequences of not bailing out these companies, the loss jobs not only in the auto industry but in the industries they support like steel, the chance that the economy could get even worse, and the blow to the American spirit that the folding of this companies would be. In this situation the only solution is to come to the center.
I strongly agree with the course of action proposed by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman that was developed by former Detroit Bureau Chief Paul Ingrassia.
““In return for any direct government aid,” he wrote, “the board and the management [of G.M.] should go. Shareholders should lose their paltry remaining equity. And a government-appointed receiver — someone hard-nosed and nonpolitical — should have broad power to revamp G.M. with a viable business plan and return it to a private operation as soon as possible. That will mean tearing up existing contracts with unions, dealers and suppliers, closing some operations and selling others and downsizing the company … Giving G.M. a blank check — which the company and the United Auto Workers union badly want, and which Washington will be tempted to grant — would be an enormous mistake.”
I would add other conditions: Any car company that gets taxpayer money must demonstrate a plan for transforming every vehicle in its fleet to a hybrid-electric engine with flex-fuel capability, so its entire fleet can also run on next generation cellulosic ethanol. “”
Their plan is the exact courses of action that I would take, provide government aid, but with no frills and certainly not a blank check. By essentially nationalizing the company it takes its potential negative effects on the market away and give the national economy along with the car companies time to recover and reengineer themselves for a successful future.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/opinion/12friedman.html?emc=eta1
Obama’s Pledge
November 17, 2008 at 3:13 pm | In Source: Newspapers, US President, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentWhile support for Obama increased to a majority of Americans voting for him in the election, it is crucial for Obama to not only maintain this support, but also to gain the support of Republicans who strongly favored John McCain. Although the split between supporters is not as evenly divided as in the Bush/Kerry election, Obama must attempt to get these conservatives to at least accept his new position as president of the United States.
In an article written in the New York Times, Obama pledges that there will be Republicans appointed to the cabinet. He thinks that doing so would provide him a “team of rivals.” Appointing at least one Republican to the cabinet is also Obama’s way of trying to follow the example set by the 16th president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. Obama speaks of Lincoln’s approach as having “a wisdom there and a humility about his approach to government, even before he was president, that [Obama] just find[s] very helpful.” How will this decision affect Obama’s popularity amongst Americans? Well honestly, it seems that there is very little that Obama could do at the moment to lose the support of those who voted for him in the election, so most likely this decision will just help to win over some more Republican support.
Obama is aware of the challenges that lie before him. Not only is Obama entering office with a divided country, but also a country facing many problems socially and economically. Supposedly he is ready to take on this challenge stating, “I will say that the challenges that we’re confronting are enormous And they’re multiple And so there are times during the course of a given a day where you think, ‘Where do I start in terms of moving, moving things forward?’ And I think that part of this next two months is to really get a clear set of priorities, understanding we’re not going be able to do everything at once, making sure the team is in place, and moving forward in a very deliberate way and sending a clear signal to the American people that we’re going to be thinking about them and what they’re going through.” While this answer is slightly vague and does not provide a direct solution, clearly a majority of Americans trust his judgment and believe he will be able to pull America out of the current times of turmoil. Whether he can actually accomplish this task, however, is a mystery left to be revealed within the next four years.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/obama-pledges-to-appoint-republican-to-cabinet/
Gun Purchasing Frenzy
November 17, 2008 at 12:16 am | In Group 1, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Group One
After Obama was officially elected on November 4, 2008, the world sat in awe as history had been made in American politics. However, what came after has had a shocking impression on the gun industry across America. Sales of homes, cars, and furniture may be on a decline, but gun manufacturers have greatly benefited from their liberal opponent elected to the White House.
Since Obama’s election, many have flocked to local gun shops to purchase weapons in fear that Obama will outlaw guns once he is sworn into office. As CNN reported, this is quite a difference compared to the 2004 election, as many did not view John Kerry as liberal as they view Obama. Obama and Biden together have created one of the most liberal tickets in many decades causing the ‘bitter, gun-and-religion-people-who-are-apathetic-to-those-not-like-them’ conservatives to worrying about their future rights. However, bizarrely, it is not only Republicans flocking to the gun counter, it is also those ‘Reagan Democrats’ that fear the soon to come Obama administration. Do people honestly think that their Second Amendment right is just going to be taken away from them?
Here we are, in the 21st century, and people are rapidly responding to the election in a spastic manner to make sure they own as many guns as they can get their hands on. Whenever Americans feel uneasy about the future, gun sales always increase. An interviewee on Fox News said that the gun manufacturers oddly had the highest purchases in decades after Bill Clinton was elected to the White House back in 1992. Americans flocked from everywhere as politics prompted the fear that their safety would be jeopardized. Coincidentally, people feel that their safety will be greatly amplified by allowing more to continue to get their hands on guns. It has always baffled me that people worry about the security of their family whenever they cannot own a gun, but they fail to realize that someone much more dangerous may need to be kept from purchasing that same gun. With more guns in circulation, you would think that American’s would worry about their safety, not a ban that prevents their sales.
The Illinois State Rifle Association director said, “Most gun owners have been misled by Senator Obama. Though he claims to be an advocate for the Second Amendment, his voting record in the Illinois Senate says otherwise. He voted for a bill that would ban nearly every hunting rifle, shotgun, and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens.” As many fear that he will soon ban their right guaranteed through the Bill of Rights of the Constitution, they are flocking to buy an array of weapons to hide in their homes in case of an emergency. Ridiculously, many gun shop owners have doubled their revenues this month as thousands of guns and ammunition have been sold to Americans across the nation, as they fear the future of their rights.
Guns should be harder to obtain in order to keep aggressive citizens from using them in hostile situations. With our easy gun laws, anyone can own/use a gun attributing to many more deaths in our society. Maybe Obama has a point that we should all look in to. Who knows, maybe our safety will be increased rather than lessened.
November 17, 2008 at 12:13 am | In Source: Newspapers, US President, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Recently, President-elect Barack Obama discussed in a “60 Minutes” interview that he was not planning to only select Democrats as members of his cabinet. He hinted that he would appoint a “team of rivals,” meaning his appointees would include Republicans. This notion stemmed from Obama’s seeming admiration of Abraham Lincoln, calling him a “very wise man”.
This news should be relieving to Republicans in the United States who feared a complete Democratic takeover in federal government. Many people feared that the election of Obama/Biden would lead to a government without any checks and balances because all that surrounded the President and had any control over policy would be Democrats. Obama’s decision to appoint members of both Republican and Democratic affiliation shows his desire to do what’s best for the nation as a whole, not only for those who support him and his ideas. It shows how hard Obama is trying to gain the support of Republicans and unite our nation. It’s so exciting that we will have a President in the White House who is trying to appeal to and appease all of our nation, not give way to members of specific ideologies or groups. It’s really refreshing in a government whose members make many of their decisions based on individual preferences or policies that would be better for their local supporters, as opposed to making decisions that are in the best interest of the country as a whole. I think Obama’s decision is a good sign for the future of our government and sets a good example for Congress.
The Wall Obama’s Up Against
November 9, 2008 at 10:50 pm | In Source: Newspapers, US President, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentThroughout the course of the election, Obama made many promises to the public about change and being different from Bush. He campaigned for tax cuts for the middle class and promised to enact them. However, Obama didn’t realize the enormous walls he was up against. Now that the national deficit has increased towards $1 trillion and the unemployment continues to increase, he’s starting to realize that before those promises are kept, he must do something that is best for the entire nation, in the current economic crisis they are faced with. Obama must first solve the giant issue which was created before he took office, cleaning up the mess of the presidency before him.
Because there is such a financial crisis, Obama as president is now responsible for solving it. He will be unable to provide the significant tax cuts he promised at this time because those plans were made before they were aware of the situation they would now be in. While it’s understanding that people are ready to see the change Obama has been preaching as the major component of his campaign, I hope the public can understand the crisis we are in and the dire need of Obama to first handle that situation before moving on to the changes he plans to and will make. I hope the public can realize that significant change will not and cannot happen as quickly as they like, and may not even be possible in Obama’s presidency. I fear former Obama supporters may begin turning against him when they don’t see the enormous change they want, not understanding that he must first set the stage for this change to happen.
What’s Next?
November 9, 2008 at 10:49 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Group 5, Senate
Kay Hagan won the spot for NC senate on Tuesday saying, “what a difference a year makes!” and she couldn’t be more right. When Hagan had gotten into the race over a year ago, it seemed like Dole would be sure to win. In Hagan’s acceptance speech Tuesday night, Hagan said, “the press, the pundits, other politicians were all ready to write this race off and hand Elizabeth Dole the keys to her office for another 6 years.” However, according to Hagan, “it’s not her office—and we knew better.”
We know that the American people wanted one thing—change; and Kay Hagan promised it to the people of North Carolina. Along with the rest of the Democratic Party, Hagan ran a strong campaign, convincing many people to get involved and become active. Now that the election is over, where do these supporters go, what do they do? They’ve spent over a year with their lives dedicated to gaining support for Hagan—“door-knocking, phone-banking, blogging, joining Ruby Red Slippers Decorating parties, [and] hosting [her] in [their] communities.” Now these people that were an essential component in the manpower of Hagan’s campaign have a lot of extra time on their hands.
Hagan makes it clear in her speech that this is not the end. Standing up here tonight isn’t the end of the campaign,” says Hagan, “it’s the beginning of our fight to bring real change to Washington, the kind of change that will make a difference here in North Carolina.” That seems great and we all know that we need change, but what can we DO? Hagan ends her speech with, “And as I thank you tonight for your support, I’m also asking for your help. Democrat, Republican, or Independent — get involved in your community: volunteer at your church, in your kids’ schools, or for our veterans.”
If Hagan can get people so excited about getting involved in a campaign then maybe she can get people excited about the involvement in other aspects of the community. The hope and improvements that could be made by such involvement and dedication to our community could, without a doubt, make North Carolina an even more beautiful place. Change is going to be inevitable as Hagan and the other newly elected officials begin to take charge in North Carolina and Washington D.C., and what this change will bring to the citizens of our state and nation is, undeniably, going to be very interesting.
Coming Down to the Wire
November 5, 2008 at 12:46 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentAs election day nears and there is no clear cut winner in the polls candidates sometimes become desperate in their attempts to win. Many times this results in campaign commercials that are very negateive. In Elizabeth Dole’s latest attack she calls Kay Hagen godless. The commercial was univerally criticized for being so negative and Kay Hagen is currently sueing for slander. This response further hurts Elizabeth Dole. Not only is she going to hurt from the negative press that this ad is generating but further more Kay Hagen is really calling her out by sueing here which creates a feeling that Dole did something wrong. Regardless of the result of the sueing debacle there is a clear message in this behavior. With the race on the line candidates will go very far to win.
http://www.wspa.com/spa/news/local/article/kay_hagen_sues_elizabeth_dole_over_campaign_ad/10464/
“Auntie Irrelevant”
November 2, 2008 at 11:10 pm | In Source: Newspapers, US President, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentNews has recently surfaced regarding a relative of Senator Obama’s. Apparently a Kenyan aunt of his, Zeituni Onyango, has been living in the United States illegally, ever since her appeal for political asylum was rejected in 2004. Of course news of this has been released just days before election day, implying that motives of this leak were political and meant only to harm Obama’s campaign and chances of winning the Presidential election. Obama and his aides claim that he was unaware of his aunt’s illegal status in the country. Accusations that he knew otherwise are ridiculous and poorly based at best. Ms. Onyango is one of many relatives of Senator Obama’s that he has had hardly any contact with throughout his life.
It seems silly to me that this issue has even been brought to light, especially just 72 hours before the election. When news of Sarah Palin’s unwed, teenage daughter’s pregnancy was released, Republicans came down hard on those who used this as judgment of Palin’s ability in politics. The same can be same for this issue regarding Senator Obama. How this relative, whom he did not meet until adulthood and barely had contact with, is relevant to the current campaign is completely beyond me. Why the desperate need to find anything to tear down Obama? I wonder the political affiliation of the person who leaked the confidential status regarding Ms. Onyango.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/02/us/politics/02campaign.html?ref=politics
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7704052.stm
“The Promise of Twenty-one”
November 2, 2008 at 8:42 pm | In Source: Newspapers, US President, Uncategorized | Leave a CommentWith only days left before the election, John McCain and Sarah Palin redirect their focus towards Pennsylvania in the hope that their efforts might cause the typically Democratic state to go Republican. In a state where democrats outnumber republicans by 1.2 million, the chance of the republicans winning seems unlikely, but McCain still remains hopeful. Since the Democrats strongly supported Hillary Clinton in the state’s primaries, it may be easier for the Republicans to win over these supporters.
With McCain now fighting to win swing states, an article in the Washington Post says winning Pennsylvania could seal the victory for him. Senator Joseph Lieberman and Lynn Forester de Rothschild, originally main contributors to Clinton’s campaign, plan to speak to Democrats to try to gain support for McCain. In the words of Rothschild, “I think Pennsylvania could be a big surprise to the conventional thought in the Democratic party. Pennsylvania is a conservative Democratic state, and John McCain can win it. We are targeting independents and Democrats, and they’re just not comfortable with Barack Obama’s plan for America, because it’s outside of the mainstream…The election could turn right here.” This election seems to be causing many voters to vote differently than in the past. Some republicans support Obama and likewise, some democrats support McCain. It is interesting however that top supporters for Hillary Clinton now support Obama, and they’re not the only ones.
In South Carolina, volunteer Joe White has never campaigned for a presidential candidate. This year, however, more and more volunteers seem to be trying to rally support behind their candidate of choice, and White’s no exception. He traveled to Pennsylvania last week and went door-to-door trying to gain support for McCain. He says, “You’d be surprised how many people I’ve already talked to around here who said they just won’t vote for Obama. I’m telling you, there’s a whole community of us.” Mitch Hagmaier, a registered Democrat who now supports McCain, also says of Pennsylvania “It’s striking how many registered Democrats are here or working in the [Republican] office. We’re starting to get some momentum going our way. With Palin coming here, and this crowd, you can feel it starting to turn.”
It is remarkable that a state that voted Democrat for the past twenty years may now go Republican, and it should make people wonder what’s changed. With Obama gaining increasing support in states that typically always go republican, this presidential race could easily go either way. McCain possibly winning Pennsylvania also means the chance of winning twenty-one electoral votes, which could cement his victory. White likes to remind himself that “it’s not over until the fat lady sings,” and in a few days this unconventional race for America’s next president will finally reach the finish line.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR2008103104022.html?nav=rss_print/asection&sid=ST2008103103910&s_pos=
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.